Skip to main content

Lee Kwan Yew: On Maintaining a Strong Economy and Defence

Without a strong economy, there can be no strong defence. 

Without a strong defence, there will be no Singapore. 

It will become a satellite cowed and intimidated by its neighbours. 

To maintain a strong economy and a strong defence all on a narrow base of a small island with over four million people, the government must be led by the ablest, most dedicated and toughest. 

The task will become more complex as a more educated and confident electorate believe that Singapore has created a sturdy base and need not be as vulnerable as before. 

What will never change is that only the best can lead and secure such a Singapore.



We need a sturdy, strong and capable SAF, not only to defend Singapore but return blow for blow when necessary. 


If we do not have this strong SAF, we are vulnerable to all kinds of pressure, from both Malaysia and Indonesia. 

To have such an SAF, we need a robust economy that is not easily put off-course by external shocks. 

The economy needs constant renewal of its structure and of the type of industries and services it attracts, those that require higher skills to manage a better-educated population. 

We have been successful for the present in attracting investments. 

So we have had to bring in immigrants and foreign workers from Malaysia, China, India and the region. 

If we do not have these immigrants and foreign workers, the economic opportunities will pass us by. 

To miss these investments would be stupid. Every major investment strengthens and expands the base of our economy and makes it less likely that we will be badly affected by a downturn in any particular sector. 

The economy and defence are closely interlinked. 

Without strong economic growth, we cannot keep up the kind of 3G SAF, one that every few years has to renew its equipment with new-generation missiles, ships, aircraft and submarines. 

We need the sea lanes to Singapore to be open; hence a capable navy is crucial.

- Lee Kwan Yew, 2011; Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Word of the Day: Countenance

1a : look, expression … a countenance which expressed both good humor and intelligence …— Sir Walter Scott b : mental composure … startled, and also somewhat out of countenance.— Arnold Bennett c : calm expression He managed to keep his countenance through the ordeal. 2 : face, visage especially : the face as an indication of mood, emotion, or character The photograph showed his somber countenance. 3 : bearing or expression that offers approval or sanction : moral support … her countenance of their unsafe amusements …— Jane Austen

Multi-decade Inflation Warnings

Last night my copy of the "University of Berkshire Hathaway" arrived in the mail. It gives a brief summary of the shareholder meetings conducted by Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger from 1986 - 2017. I was surprised to find that Buffet has been warning about the ills of inflation since 1986! "As long as politicians lack self-restraint, they will print a lot of money at some point." Buffet predicts as early as the 1986 meeting that that America will see "substantial inflation" at "rates we've never seen before" . Buffet's tone reminds me of my Twitter feed, which suggest that a massive Wiemar Republic style hyper-inflation event is right around the corner. To see today's inflation messages emulated in a publication from 34 years ago gave me a valuable perspective that these things play out over time. Like a frog boiling in water. I'm adjusting my present day internet media consumption to 10-20% of my information diet with books and

Mises, Ludwig Von: On Inaction

 “The vigorous man industriously striving for the improvement of his condition acts neither more nor less than the lethargic man who sluggishly takes things as they come.  For to do nothing and to be idle are also action, they too determine the course of events.  Wherever the conditions for human interference are present, man acts no matter whether he interferes or refrains from interfering.  He who endures what he could change acts no less than he who interferes in order to attain another result.  A man who abstains from influencing the operation of physiological and instinctive factors which he could influence also acts.  Action is not only doing but no less omitting to do what possibly could be done. We may say that action is the manifestation of a man’s will.  But this would not add to our knowledge.  For the term will means nothing else than man’s faculty to choose between different states of affairs, to prefer one, to set aside the other, and to behave accordingly to the decision