Skip to main content

Paul Johnson on Wild Credit Fuelled Speculation 1928-29

From the beginning of 1928 the element of unreality, of fantasy indeed, began to grow.

As Bagehot put it, 'All people are most credulous when they are most happy.'

The number of shares changing hands, a record of 567,990,875 in 1927, went to 920,550,032.


Two new and sinister elements emerged: a vast increase in margin-trading and a rash of hastily cobbled-together investment trusts.

Traditionally, stocks were valued at about ten times earnings.

With high margin-trading, earnings on shares, only 1 or 2 percent, were far less than the 8-12 percent interest on loans used to buy them.

This meant that any profits were in capital gains alone.

Thus Radio Corporation of America, which had never paid a dividend at all, went form 85 to 420 points in 1928.

By 1929 some stocks were selling at fifty times earnings.

As one expert put it, the market was 'discounting not merely the future but the hereafter'.

A market-boom based on capital gains is merely a form of pyramid-selling.

The new investment trusts, which by the end of 1928 were emerging at the rate of one a day, were archetypal inverted pyramids.

They had what was called 'high leverage' through their own supposedly shrewd investments and secured, and secured phenomenal growth on the basis of a very small plith of real growth.

Thus the United Founders Corporation was built up into a company with nominal resources of $686,165,000 from an original investment (by a bankrupt) of a mere $500.

The 1929 market value of another investment trust was over a billion dollars, but its chief asset was an electric company worth only $6 million in 1921. 

They were supposed to enable the 'little man' to get 'piece of the action'.

In fact they merely provided an additional superstructure of almost pure speculation, and the 'high leverage' worked in reverse once the market broke.


Degringolade, Modern Times,

Paul Johnson

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Word of the Day: Countenance

1a : look, expression … a countenance which expressed both good humor and intelligence …— Sir Walter Scott b : mental composure … startled, and also somewhat out of countenance.— Arnold Bennett c : calm expression He managed to keep his countenance through the ordeal. 2 : face, visage especially : the face as an indication of mood, emotion, or character The photograph showed his somber countenance. 3 : bearing or expression that offers approval or sanction : moral support … her countenance of their unsafe amusements …— Jane Austen

Multi-decade Inflation Warnings

Last night my copy of the "University of Berkshire Hathaway" arrived in the mail. It gives a brief summary of the shareholder meetings conducted by Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger from 1986 - 2017. I was surprised to find that Buffet has been warning about the ills of inflation since 1986! "As long as politicians lack self-restraint, they will print a lot of money at some point." Buffet predicts as early as the 1986 meeting that that America will see "substantial inflation" at "rates we've never seen before" . Buffet's tone reminds me of my Twitter feed, which suggest that a massive Wiemar Republic style hyper-inflation event is right around the corner. To see today's inflation messages emulated in a publication from 34 years ago gave me a valuable perspective that these things play out over time. Like a frog boiling in water. I'm adjusting my present day internet media consumption to 10-20% of my information diet with books and

Mises, Ludwig Von: On Inaction

 “The vigorous man industriously striving for the improvement of his condition acts neither more nor less than the lethargic man who sluggishly takes things as they come.  For to do nothing and to be idle are also action, they too determine the course of events.  Wherever the conditions for human interference are present, man acts no matter whether he interferes or refrains from interfering.  He who endures what he could change acts no less than he who interferes in order to attain another result.  A man who abstains from influencing the operation of physiological and instinctive factors which he could influence also acts.  Action is not only doing but no less omitting to do what possibly could be done. We may say that action is the manifestation of a man’s will.  But this would not add to our knowledge.  For the term will means nothing else than man’s faculty to choose between different states of affairs, to prefer one, to set aside the other, and to behave accordingly to the decision